7 |
timing and extent of our audit procedures and the evaluation of the effect of identified
misstatements on our opinion.
We have exercised professional judgement and have maintained professional scepticism
throughout the audit, in accordance with Dutch Standards on Auditing, ethical requirements
and independence requirements. Our audit included among others:
u Identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements,
whether due to fraud or error, designing and performing audit procedures responsive to
those risks, and obtaining audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a
basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from
fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery,
intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control;
u Obtaining an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design
audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control;
u Evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of
accounting estimates and related disclosures made by the Board of Directors;
u Concluding on the appropriateness of the Board of Directors’ use of the going concern
basis of accounting, and based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material
uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the
entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty
exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures
in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s
report. However, future events or conditions may cause a company to cease to continue as
a going concern;
u Evaluating the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial statements,
including the disclosures; and
u Evaluating whether the financial statements represent the underlying transactions and
events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
We communicate with the Board of Directors regarding, among other matters, the planned
scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant findings
in internal control that we identify during our audit. In this respect we also submit an
additional report to the audit committee in accordance with Article 11 of the EU Regulation
on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities. The information
included in this additional report is consistent with our audit opinion in this auditor’s report.
We provide the Board of Directors with a statement that we have complied with relevant
ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all
relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence,
and where applicable, related safeguards.
From the matters communicated with the Board of Directors, we determine the key audit
matters: those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the financial
statements. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation
precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, not
communicating the matter is in the public interest.