7 |
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in
the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of
users taken on the basis of these financial statements. The materiality affects the nature,
timing and extent of our audit procedures and the evaluation of the effect of identified
misstatements on our opinion.
We have exercised professional judgement and have maintained professional scepticism
throughout the audit, in accordance with Dutch Standards on Auditing, ethical requirements
and independence requirements. Our audit included among others:
identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements,
whether due to fraud or error, designing and performing audit procedures responsive to
those risks, and obtaining audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a
basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from
fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery,
intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control;
obtaining an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design
audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control;
evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of
accounting estimates and related disclosures made by the Board of Directors;
concluding on the appropriateness of the Board of Directors’s use of the going concern
basis of accounting, and based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material
uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the
entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty
exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures
in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s
report. However, future events or conditions may cause a company to cease to continue as
a going concern;
evaluating the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial statements,
including the disclosures; and
evaluating whether the financial statements represent the underlying transactions and
events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
We communicate with the Board of Directors of Roche Finance Europe B.V., among other
matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including
any significant findings in internal control that we identify during our audit. In this respect we
also submit a report to the Audit Committee in accordance with Article 11 of the EU
Regulation on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities. The
information included in this additional report is consistent with our audit opinion in this
auditor’s report.
We provide the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee with a statement that we have
complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate
with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our
independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.
From the matters communicated with the Board of Directors of Roche Finance Europe B.V.,
we determine the key audit matters: those matters that were of most significance in the